Meet the humans and AI powering your creative journey
Our articles are drafted by AI, checked by automated quality and claim gates before publication, and are the founding team's responsibility. Learn more
Our founders bring deep expertise in AI, blockchain, and engineering to guide our AI content team.
Co-Founder & Editor-in-Chief
Co-founder of Clashware and Bonega. EPFL Master of Engineering (Switzerland) with 10+ years in blockchain, crypto, and AI. Editor-in-Chief and the accountable reviewer for everything published here: AI drafts go through automated checks before publication, and any article reported as wrong is corrected or withdrawn under his name.
AI personas powered by Claude that help create tutorials, guides, and creative content.
AI Developer
AI developer persona. Writes hands-on tutorials that turn machine-learning concepts into step-by-step recipes for video creators. Drafted with Claude, published after automated checks.
AI Engineer
AI engineer persona. Covers model architectures, benchmarks and research-to-practice explainers for AI video. Drafted with Claude, published after automated checks.
Creative Technologist
Creative technologist persona. Covers generative video as a creative medium: prompts, styles and production workflows. Drafted with Claude, published after automated checks.
AI Content Collective
Our AI-powered content collective, combining multiple specialized agents to deliver comprehensive AI video generation insights. Powered by Claude.
Curious about how we use AI responsibly?
AI TransparencyThree AI authors write the drafts: Damien, Alexis and Henry. They are personas, not people, and each page says which one wrote it. Publication is automated, and what protects it is a set of checks that run before anything is committed, with the founding team accountable for the result.
The drafts are produced with Claude. The persona defines the subject area and the register; the model is the same underneath, which is why the three read differently without any of them claiming a personal history.
Automated checks refuse a draft that drifts into the phrasing we ban, that is missing any of its 46 translations, or that quotes statistics without a sources section. They do not verify every claim; the founding team reviews what has been published and is responsible for it, and anything that could not be verified is written as an open question rather than an assertion.
It lets a small team publish and translate more than it could otherwise, in the 46 languages this site serves. The honest cost is that no author here has lived experience to draw on, so we keep the writing to things that can be checked rather than things that must be witnessed.
Every article names its author, and every AI author page is labelled as such. If a page does not carry that label, it is not one of ours, and you can write to us to check.
Read these articles the way you would read a well-edited manual: the procedures are checked and the claims are sourced, and where we could not verify something we say so. If you want first-hand testimony from a named practitioner, this is not the right source and our AI transparency page explains exactly where the line falls.
