MiniMax Hailuo 02: China's Budget AI Video Model Challenges the Giants
MiniMax's Hailuo 02 delivers competitive video quality at a fraction of the cost, with 10 videos for the price of one Veo 3 clip. Here is what makes this Chinese challenger worth watching.

The Numbers That Matter
MiniMax officially launched Hailuo 02 in June 2025, and it quickly gained attention for punching above its weight class. On the Video Arena benchmark, which uses blind human evaluation where judges compare videos without knowing which model made them, Hailuo 02 scores competitively against models costing 5-10x more.
The current leaderboard shows Runway Gen-4.5 at #1, followed by Google Veo 3 and Kling 2.5. Hailuo 02 holds a solid position in the top tier, but the real story is the value proposition: similar quality at a fraction of the price.
What Powers Hailuo 02
The technical architecture behind this performance is called NCR, short for Noise-aware Compute Redistribution. MiniMax claims it delivers 2.5x faster training and inference compared to their previous models.
Specifications
| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Resolution | Up to 1080p |
| Duration | 6-10 seconds |
| Frame Rate | 24-30 FPS |
| Parameters | 3x previous version |
| Training Data | 4x previous version |
Pricing Comparison
| Model | 6s Video Cost |
|---|---|
| Hailuo 02 (768p) | $0.28 |
| Hailuo 02 (1080p) | $0.49 |
| Google Veo 3 (1080p, 8s) | ~$3.00 |
| Runway Gen-4.5 | ~$1.50 |
The cost difference is staggering. For the price of one Veo 3 video, you could generate roughly 10 Hailuo clips. For teams producing high volumes of content, this changes the economics entirely.
Hailuo 02 is available through MiniMax's consumer app and via API platforms like fal.ai. The pricing scales linearly, no complex credit systems.
Where Hailuo 02 Excels
Based on user benchmarks and creator feedback, Hailuo 02 stands out in several areas:
Physics Simulation
Object interactions, fluid dynamics, and natural motion patterns render with surprising accuracy. Fast action sequences that trip up other models work smoothly here.
Prompt Adherence
The model follows complex instructions closely. Multi-element scenes with specific camera movements and character actions translate reliably from text to video.
Asian Facial Details
MiniMax trained heavily on Chinese content creators, and it shows. Facial expressions and Asian features render with nuance that Western models sometimes struggle with.
One creator comparison put it bluntly: "Sora is like the Nokia to Hailuo's iPhone." That might be hyperbole, but the sentiment reflects genuine surprise at how quickly Chinese models have caught up.
The Trade-offs
No model is perfect. Hailuo 02 has clear limitations:
- Superior physics simulation
- Best-in-class prompt following
- Dramatically lower costs
- Strong on complex motion
- No native audio generation (Veo 3 and Sora 2 include it)
- Slow generation speeds (15x slower than Veo in some tests)
- Maximum 10-second clips
- Content moderation can be strict
The speed issue is significant for iteration-heavy workflows. Multiple users reported that you can generate 15 Veo videos in the time it takes Hailuo to produce one. If real-time feedback matters to your process, that lag adds up.
Hailuo 02 currently lacks audio generation. If you need synchronized dialogue or sound effects in a single pass, Veo 3 or Sora 2 remain better choices.
The Hailuo 2.3 Consumer Update
While Hailuo 02 targets developers via API, MiniMax also updated the consumer-facing Hailuo app to version 2.3 in December 2025. This version includes:
- ✓Cinematic realism with lifelike expressions
- ✓Improved physics for action sequences
- ✓Creative tools including ASMR and character modes
- ✓Free trial access for new users
The consumer app positions Hailuo as a TikTok-style creative tool, while the API serves professional production needs. MiniMax is clearly playing both markets simultaneously.
Why This Matters
The AI video space is becoming genuinely competitive. Six months ago, the conversation was simple: OpenAI Sora for hype, Google Veo for quality, Runway for accessibility. Now?
- Runway Gen-4.5: #1 in blind benchmarks
- Google Veo 3: #2 with native audio generation
- Kling 2.5: #3 with strong Chinese market presence
- Hailuo 02: Top tier at 10% of the cost
- OpenAI Sora 2: Lower than expected despite the hype
This is healthy competition. When trillion-dollar companies cannot rest on resources alone, innovation accelerates. We covered this pattern when Runway beat Google and OpenAI. Hailuo 02 adds another dimension: cost efficiency. For budget-conscious creators, it offers a compelling alternative to premium Western models.
The China Factor
MiniMax is not the only Chinese player making moves. Consider the broader landscape:
Kling Emerges
Kuaishou's Kling AI enters the market with strong motion capabilities.
Vidu 2.0 Launches
Tsinghua-backed ShengShu releases Vidu with sub-10-second generation times.
Hailuo 02 Ships
MiniMax enters top tier with aggressive pricing strategy.
TurboDiffusion
ShengShu open-sources 100-200x faster diffusion framework.
China's AI video ecosystem is maturing rapidly. TurboDiffusion from ShengShu, Kling 2.6's voice cloning, and now Hailuo 02's benchmark performance demonstrate that Chinese labs are not just catching up. They are leading in specific areas.
What This Means for Creators
If you are choosing tools right now, here is my updated take:
| Priority | Best Choice |
|---|---|
| Visual quality (cost no object) | Runway Gen-4.5 |
| Visual quality (budget matters) | Hailuo 02 |
| Native audio integration | Sora 2 or Veo 3 |
| Fastest iteration speed | Veo 3 |
| Open source / local | LTX-2 or TurboDiffusion |
For high-volume production where cost matters, Hailuo 02 now deserves serious consideration. Ten videos for the price of one is a significant difference.
Try Hailuo 02 through the consumer app first. Free tier access lets you evaluate quality before committing to API integration.
Looking Forward
The AI video market continues consolidating around a handful of strong players. What is new is that those players are no longer exclusively American. MiniMax, Kuaishou, and ShengShu have demonstrated that focused engineering can compete with billion-dollar R&D budgets.
For creators and developers, this is good news. Competition drives down prices and drives up quality. The tools shipping today would have seemed impossible two years ago.
Hailuo 02 is not perfect. The speed limitations and lack of audio generation are real constraints. But for pure visual quality at accessible prices, MiniMax just proved that the best AI video models do not have to come from Silicon Valley.
The race is on, and it is genuinely global now.
Related Reading: For more on the competitive landscape, see our Sora 2 vs Runway vs Veo 3 comparison, or learn about how diffusion transformers work under the hood.
Was this article helpful?

Henry
Creative TechnologistCreative technologist from Lausanne exploring where AI meets art. Experiments with generative models between electronic music sessions.
Related Articles
Continue exploring with these related posts

Pika 2.5: Democratizing AI Video Through Speed, Price, and Creative Tools
Pika Labs releases version 2.5, combining faster generation, enhanced physics, and creative tools like Pikaframes and Pikaffects to make AI video accessible to everyone.

SenseTime Seko 2.0: Generate 100-Episode AI Series from a Single Prompt
SenseTime just launched the industry's first multi-episode AI video agent. Seko 2.0 can create entire animated series with consistent characters, voices, and storylines from one creative idea. The era of AI-generated serialized content has arrived.

The Complete Guide to AI Video Prompt Engineering in 2025
Master the art of crafting prompts that produce stunning AI-generated videos. Learn the six-layer framework, cinematic terminology, and platform-specific techniques.